Emily Bauer's family was told in December the teenager would never
recognize them again. She had suffered multiple strokes after smoking
synthetic marijuana, and a large portion of her brain was damaged. She
would be unaware of her surroundings and never regain control of her
arms and legs, doctors said.
Nine months later, 17-year-old Emily returned to Cy-Fair High School in Cypress, Texas.
Best European cigarettes online at the cheapest prices. Fresh Cigarette news online.
Friday, November 29, 2013
Smoking vet allowed to stay in home
A 90-year-old, WWII veteran was on the verge of being evicted from
his apartment in Newington over a smoking rule and on Tuesday, he went
to Housing Court in Hartford to avoid eviction.
Andy Nowicki, who is on oxygen and has trouble walking, and his 90-year-old wife, who suffers from dementia, live at his apartment at the Cedar Village Elderly Housing Complex.
Cedar Village is run by the Newington Housing Authority.
Nowicki received eviction papers this summer after he said he isn't able to follow the new rule requiring residents to smoke at least 10 feet outside their homes.
War wounds and other ailments can make it tough for Nowicki to get outside. He said he has done the best he can on his scooter, but sometimes he could only make it to a breezeway outside his apartment.
"I think there's nobody here to stand up for our elderly," said his daughter Janet Nowicki. "And if I wasn't here, my brother wasn't here, my family wasn't here, where would they be?"
On Tuesday, Nowicki was surrounded by fellow veterans at Housing Court. He said he would rather be in battle with them, than deal with the Newington Housing Authority.
"I'd rather go back to the infantry and be in the outfit I was with," Nowicki said.
Janet Nowicki spoke up for her parents, contacting state Sen. Paul Doyle, who volunteered to represent Andy Nowicki for free.
"I think today common sense prevailed," Doyle said. "This should have happened months ago."
Tuesday after hours of mediation, both sides reached an agreement.
The Housing Authority director left court without talking to Eyewitness News, but the station did learn they won't evict Andy Nowicki and his wife.
Andy Nowicki will still have to abide by the 10 foot rule when he smokes, but in order to make that possible the housing authority will make his apartment handicapped accessible in the next 30 days. Nowicki and his wife will also be moved to the top of the list for a fully handicapped accessible apartment when one becomes available.
Doyle said he is also working with the veterans affairs commissioner to put in a ramp and canopy. Veterans told Eyewitness News they were happy to help, but are disappointed it got to this point.
"I just learned one thing today," said veteran Russ Meek. "I saw how the state of Connecticut can really waste money on something so inappropriate as trying to pick on a 90-year-old veteran."
Andy Nowicki, who is on oxygen and has trouble walking, and his 90-year-old wife, who suffers from dementia, live at his apartment at the Cedar Village Elderly Housing Complex.
Cedar Village is run by the Newington Housing Authority.
Nowicki received eviction papers this summer after he said he isn't able to follow the new rule requiring residents to smoke at least 10 feet outside their homes.
War wounds and other ailments can make it tough for Nowicki to get outside. He said he has done the best he can on his scooter, but sometimes he could only make it to a breezeway outside his apartment.
"I think there's nobody here to stand up for our elderly," said his daughter Janet Nowicki. "And if I wasn't here, my brother wasn't here, my family wasn't here, where would they be?"
On Tuesday, Nowicki was surrounded by fellow veterans at Housing Court. He said he would rather be in battle with them, than deal with the Newington Housing Authority.
"I'd rather go back to the infantry and be in the outfit I was with," Nowicki said.
Janet Nowicki spoke up for her parents, contacting state Sen. Paul Doyle, who volunteered to represent Andy Nowicki for free.
"I think today common sense prevailed," Doyle said. "This should have happened months ago."
Tuesday after hours of mediation, both sides reached an agreement.
The Housing Authority director left court without talking to Eyewitness News, but the station did learn they won't evict Andy Nowicki and his wife.
Andy Nowicki will still have to abide by the 10 foot rule when he smokes, but in order to make that possible the housing authority will make his apartment handicapped accessible in the next 30 days. Nowicki and his wife will also be moved to the top of the list for a fully handicapped accessible apartment when one becomes available.
Doyle said he is also working with the veterans affairs commissioner to put in a ramp and canopy. Veterans told Eyewitness News they were happy to help, but are disappointed it got to this point.
"I just learned one thing today," said veteran Russ Meek. "I saw how the state of Connecticut can really waste money on something so inappropriate as trying to pick on a 90-year-old veteran."
Monday, November 25, 2013
Illegal Tobacco Cost Australia A$1 Billion: KPMG Report
Illegal tobacco sales deprived the
Australian government of about A$1 billion ($946 million) of
taxes in the 12 months ended in June, according to a report
commissioned by cigarette makers. Winston cigarettes online.
Accounting firm KPMG LLP released the study today as the first since a federal law prohibiting the sale of cigarettes in branded packages took effect Dec. 1 to discourage smoking and reduce related spending on health care. Illicit sales increased 1.5 percentage points to 13.3 percent of total shipments, while consumption didn’t drop in the year, according to the report.
Planned increases in tobacco taxes will cause illegal sales to increase, the report said, citing Scott McIntyre, a spokesman for British American Tobacco Plc’s Australian unit. Australia announced plans in August to boost tobacco excise to raise more than A$5 billion and help narrow the country’s fiscal deficit over the next four years.
“Instead of steep excise hikes, more resources for agencies and greater enforcement of plain pack laws by the health department will see a reduction in illegal tobacco sales,” McIntyre said.
Officials from Australia’s health department didn’t immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment on the report, sent to the department’s media section.
British American Tobacco, Philip Morris International Inc. and Imperial Tobacco Australia Ltd. commissioned the KPMG report.
About 17.4 million kilograms (38 million pounds) of tobacco were consumed in Australia in the year, matching the level in the previous 12 months and compared with 18 million kilograms in 2011, according to the report.
Australia last year banned the sale of cigarettes in packaging depicting tobacco companies’ trademarks and logos. Cigarettes are now sold in olive green packs, with graphic and written health warnings covering 70 percent of the front of a package. Brands are shown in uniform font at the bottom of the package.
Australia’s top court upheld the validity of the law on Aug. 16, 2012, dismissing a challenge from the tobacco companies arguing that the government illegally seized their intellectual property.
KPMG said tobacco companies set specific terms of reference and the report was issued to the parties “for information only.” The accounting firm didn’t specify the terms of reference in the report, which covered the 12 months ended June 2013.
Accounting firm KPMG LLP released the study today as the first since a federal law prohibiting the sale of cigarettes in branded packages took effect Dec. 1 to discourage smoking and reduce related spending on health care. Illicit sales increased 1.5 percentage points to 13.3 percent of total shipments, while consumption didn’t drop in the year, according to the report.
Planned increases in tobacco taxes will cause illegal sales to increase, the report said, citing Scott McIntyre, a spokesman for British American Tobacco Plc’s Australian unit. Australia announced plans in August to boost tobacco excise to raise more than A$5 billion and help narrow the country’s fiscal deficit over the next four years.
“Instead of steep excise hikes, more resources for agencies and greater enforcement of plain pack laws by the health department will see a reduction in illegal tobacco sales,” McIntyre said.
Officials from Australia’s health department didn’t immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment on the report, sent to the department’s media section.
Price Differentials
Taxes made up about 63 percent of the price of a packet of cigarettes last year in Australia, where a pack of 25 costs about A$20 for the best-selling brands. A pack of 20 Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) Marlboro brand cigarettes sells for A$15.96, compared with A$1.08 in Vietnam, A$2.66 in China and A$10.29 in Singapore, according to the KPMG report.British American Tobacco, Philip Morris International Inc. and Imperial Tobacco Australia Ltd. commissioned the KPMG report.
About 17.4 million kilograms (38 million pounds) of tobacco were consumed in Australia in the year, matching the level in the previous 12 months and compared with 18 million kilograms in 2011, according to the report.
Australia last year banned the sale of cigarettes in packaging depicting tobacco companies’ trademarks and logos. Cigarettes are now sold in olive green packs, with graphic and written health warnings covering 70 percent of the front of a package. Brands are shown in uniform font at the bottom of the package.
Australia’s top court upheld the validity of the law on Aug. 16, 2012, dismissing a challenge from the tobacco companies arguing that the government illegally seized their intellectual property.
KPMG said tobacco companies set specific terms of reference and the report was issued to the parties “for information only.” The accounting firm didn’t specify the terms of reference in the report, which covered the 12 months ended June 2013.
Why Consumers Change Brands
Decades ago, a major cigarette brand won a lot of attention with the tagline “I’d rather fight than switch.” Today, U.S. consumers are switching brands to the tune of $1.3 trillion, and marketers appear to be swinging back with empty gloves.
According to the recently released Accenture Global Consumer Pulse Survey, 51 percent of U.S. consumers switched their retailers, banks, cable companies and other service providers in 2013. That is up 5 percent from 2012, and it represents $1.3 trillion in lost sales to the dropped brands.
Worse, to a loyalty marketer like me, is that only 18 percent of those surveyed said they feel like their service providers offer them tailored experiences. As the report states: “The gap between the use of digital technologies and the ability of companies to use them to improve customer experiences is highlighted by the survey’s findings that, among the 10 industries covered by the report, none made noticeable progress in providing customers with a tailored experience in 2013.
Esse cigarettes online.
” Not surprisingly, then, that the rate of loyalty among those surveyed consumers rose just 1 percent in the year, while their likelihood to recommend a brand rose 2 percent. These are troubling numbers, but it does not mean we loyalty marketers are down for the count. Rather, we should take these stats for what they are: an alarm bell. The loyalty marketing industry invests billions of dollars in personalization technologies, yet 82 percent of people do not think they are provided relevant experiences. Something is breaking down, and I suspect it is in that pipeline that runs between acquiring the technology and deploying the experience. The data insights are not being used to woo and wow the customer, but to craft eye-catching promotions that are relevant only to the expiration date. Companies tend to default to price as competition heats up, but you can only cut so far before hitting bone. To prevent the switch, brands should sprinkle their price tactics with some true personalization, which can be achieved through analysis of customer data. Why not try to create a brand experience that stands apart, based on what you know about customers? I’m not sure how dire the situation is and how far we are going to have to go to really push the metrics upwards, but it’s a complete miss if we are not taking advantage of the investments we make in this area. I’ll underscore the point with another finding from the research: 51 percent of those surveyed said they expect specialized treatment for being a good customer. Read more at http://www.business2community.com/loyalty-marketing/consumers-change-brands-0669505#E06Y8yWi1cmbtVwW.99
Esse cigarettes online.
” Not surprisingly, then, that the rate of loyalty among those surveyed consumers rose just 1 percent in the year, while their likelihood to recommend a brand rose 2 percent. These are troubling numbers, but it does not mean we loyalty marketers are down for the count. Rather, we should take these stats for what they are: an alarm bell. The loyalty marketing industry invests billions of dollars in personalization technologies, yet 82 percent of people do not think they are provided relevant experiences. Something is breaking down, and I suspect it is in that pipeline that runs between acquiring the technology and deploying the experience. The data insights are not being used to woo and wow the customer, but to craft eye-catching promotions that are relevant only to the expiration date. Companies tend to default to price as competition heats up, but you can only cut so far before hitting bone. To prevent the switch, brands should sprinkle their price tactics with some true personalization, which can be achieved through analysis of customer data. Why not try to create a brand experience that stands apart, based on what you know about customers? I’m not sure how dire the situation is and how far we are going to have to go to really push the metrics upwards, but it’s a complete miss if we are not taking advantage of the investments we make in this area. I’ll underscore the point with another finding from the research: 51 percent of those surveyed said they expect specialized treatment for being a good customer. Read more at http://www.business2community.com/loyalty-marketing/consumers-change-brands-0669505#E06Y8yWi1cmbtVwW.99
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
Tobacco Is No Longer Tolerated at Valley City Parks
On the heels of a state
wide smoking ban in public places, a North Dakota city is taking it one
step further. Tobacco use is now against the law in city parks and
several other city-owned areas in Valley City. Valley News team's Eric
Crest clears the air on where smoking is, and is not, allowed in the
city.
It wasn't long ago that the state of North Dakota decided it was time to embrace a new smoking ordinance.
"I loved it I absolutely loved it," says, Heather Hildebrant of Bismark.
The state wide ordinance kept cigarettes out of businesses and the approach to their entrances.
"I can bring my son outside and go anywhere and not worry about people smoking outside of buildings or inside of them anymore," adds Hildebrant. Cigaronne cigarettes .
Recently Valley City took it one step further. A handful of city property will be tobacco free now too.
"They can't smoke in any park owned property, any activity arenas outside, in any of our buildings," explains Dick Gulmon the President of the Park and Recreation Board for Valley City.
That includes playgrounds, spectator areas, athletic fields, concession areas, and even parking lots on nearly all of the cities property.
"It's our responsibility in managing the parks and recreation programming to set an example of a healthy lifestyle," says Gulmon.
"It drives me insane. They're not only effecting their body they're taking the choice away from everyone else around them that don't want it in their system," adds Hildebrant.
The Tobacco Prevention Coordinator in Valley City says by eliminating all tobacco use in public parks in town their not just reversing the normalization of tobacco use, but they're also impacting generations to come.
"I think it's the effect on the youth. I think promoting that healthy lifestyle and not seeing cigarette butts in the parks, and (not to mention) what that can do to the environment. But promoting that for the youth and setting that example," says Gulmon.
Because as the state and cities alike continue taking steps like these, it's the youth, that will reap the benefits.
"It's their choice I guess. What they want to do with their body. But it just bugs me when they do it around other people cause then we're stuck with the consequence of their choices," says Hildebrant.
Not all public parks in Valley City are tobacco free just yet. The local Tourist Park Campground and Bjornson's Public Golf Course did not end up on the list. The park board mentioned that out of concern for a loss of business to neighboring communities, they made an exception.
It wasn't long ago that the state of North Dakota decided it was time to embrace a new smoking ordinance.
"I loved it I absolutely loved it," says, Heather Hildebrant of Bismark.
The state wide ordinance kept cigarettes out of businesses and the approach to their entrances.
"I can bring my son outside and go anywhere and not worry about people smoking outside of buildings or inside of them anymore," adds Hildebrant. Cigaronne cigarettes .
Recently Valley City took it one step further. A handful of city property will be tobacco free now too.
"They can't smoke in any park owned property, any activity arenas outside, in any of our buildings," explains Dick Gulmon the President of the Park and Recreation Board for Valley City.
That includes playgrounds, spectator areas, athletic fields, concession areas, and even parking lots on nearly all of the cities property.
"It's our responsibility in managing the parks and recreation programming to set an example of a healthy lifestyle," says Gulmon.
"It drives me insane. They're not only effecting their body they're taking the choice away from everyone else around them that don't want it in their system," adds Hildebrant.
The Tobacco Prevention Coordinator in Valley City says by eliminating all tobacco use in public parks in town their not just reversing the normalization of tobacco use, but they're also impacting generations to come.
"I think it's the effect on the youth. I think promoting that healthy lifestyle and not seeing cigarette butts in the parks, and (not to mention) what that can do to the environment. But promoting that for the youth and setting that example," says Gulmon.
Because as the state and cities alike continue taking steps like these, it's the youth, that will reap the benefits.
"It's their choice I guess. What they want to do with their body. But it just bugs me when they do it around other people cause then we're stuck with the consequence of their choices," says Hildebrant.
Not all public parks in Valley City are tobacco free just yet. The local Tourist Park Campground and Bjornson's Public Golf Course did not end up on the list. The park board mentioned that out of concern for a loss of business to neighboring communities, they made an exception.
Vt. says time for addicts to quit smoking, too
Cigarettes and alcohol addiction are so strongly linked there's a running joke among those trying to quit, says T.K. Blanchard, who's been sober for a year and smoke-free for eight months.
"The joke is that when you see a lot of people smoking outside a church, you know where the (Alcoholics Anonymous) meeting is," the Montpelier 24-year-old says.
Now the state Department of Health wants to put into place a tobacco-free policy at state-funded addiction treatment centers. It's a policy that dozens of other states have already adopted. Vermont plans to put the policy into place July 1. Galaxy cigarettes.
Barbara Cimaglio, deputy health commissioner in charge of Vermont's alcohol and drug abuse prevention program, said the department can set the policy because it licenses the facilities and because the state's Medicaid program provides about 70 percent of the centers' funding.
She said tobacco is one of the biggest burdens of the population of people with addiction or mental illness. And "people say, 'Oh gosh, this poor guy is giving up alcohol and drugs — you expect him to give up cigarettes, too?' Yet we know from a health perspective, this is the thing to do."
At Another Way, a peer-support center where recovering addicts and former psychiatric patients gather, people getting ready for a meeting Tuesday offered a range of perspectives.
Blanchard was among them. He said he spent 50-days at a residential treatment center, Valley Vista in Bradford, last year, and wasn't ready during his stay there to give up tobacco. "That was the last thing I had ... It was a comfort," he said.
But four months into sobriety after leaving the center, he quit cigarettes, too. "The techniques I had learned for staying sober from drugs and alcohol made me ready when I decided to quit smoking," he said.
Others were skeptical, the new policy can work.
"That's going to be a rough one," said Ed Woods, 50. "AA, cigarettes, coffee — they kind of go hand-in-hand."
At the Brattleboro Retreat, a private psychiatric hospital that takes some of its patients under contract with the state, Kurt White, director of ambulatory services, said tobacco use was "vastly more prevalent" among people with substance abuse and mental health problems than among the general population. He said the Retreat has had a smoke-free campus for several years, but will offer nicotine patches to inpatients who arrive with a cigarette habit.
"There's a growing body of evidence that people do better with both their addictions and smoking cessation if they quit everything at once," White said. Often there are "paired associations," he said. "That drink of alcohol might have gone with a cigarette. The cigarette might have been a cue to drinking."
Cimaglio cited hospitals and newsrooms as among the places where smoking once was part of the culture but no longer is.
"This is sort of the last place where we haven't changed the culture," she said of mental health and substance abuse programs. "And there's really no reason we shouldn't do better."
"The joke is that when you see a lot of people smoking outside a church, you know where the (Alcoholics Anonymous) meeting is," the Montpelier 24-year-old says.
Now the state Department of Health wants to put into place a tobacco-free policy at state-funded addiction treatment centers. It's a policy that dozens of other states have already adopted. Vermont plans to put the policy into place July 1. Galaxy cigarettes.
Barbara Cimaglio, deputy health commissioner in charge of Vermont's alcohol and drug abuse prevention program, said the department can set the policy because it licenses the facilities and because the state's Medicaid program provides about 70 percent of the centers' funding.
She said tobacco is one of the biggest burdens of the population of people with addiction or mental illness. And "people say, 'Oh gosh, this poor guy is giving up alcohol and drugs — you expect him to give up cigarettes, too?' Yet we know from a health perspective, this is the thing to do."
At Another Way, a peer-support center where recovering addicts and former psychiatric patients gather, people getting ready for a meeting Tuesday offered a range of perspectives.
Blanchard was among them. He said he spent 50-days at a residential treatment center, Valley Vista in Bradford, last year, and wasn't ready during his stay there to give up tobacco. "That was the last thing I had ... It was a comfort," he said.
But four months into sobriety after leaving the center, he quit cigarettes, too. "The techniques I had learned for staying sober from drugs and alcohol made me ready when I decided to quit smoking," he said.
Others were skeptical, the new policy can work.
"That's going to be a rough one," said Ed Woods, 50. "AA, cigarettes, coffee — they kind of go hand-in-hand."
At the Brattleboro Retreat, a private psychiatric hospital that takes some of its patients under contract with the state, Kurt White, director of ambulatory services, said tobacco use was "vastly more prevalent" among people with substance abuse and mental health problems than among the general population. He said the Retreat has had a smoke-free campus for several years, but will offer nicotine patches to inpatients who arrive with a cigarette habit.
"There's a growing body of evidence that people do better with both their addictions and smoking cessation if they quit everything at once," White said. Often there are "paired associations," he said. "That drink of alcohol might have gone with a cigarette. The cigarette might have been a cue to drinking."
Cimaglio cited hospitals and newsrooms as among the places where smoking once was part of the culture but no longer is.
"This is sort of the last place where we haven't changed the culture," she said of mental health and substance abuse programs. "And there's really no reason we shouldn't do better."
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Electronic Cigarettes Get Amended to Anti Smoking Law
After further discussion on electronic cigarettes,
Benicia Council upheld amending these battery functioned devices to the
city’s anti smoking laws. As per the law, use of electronic cigarettes
would be restricted in indoor places including restaurants, offices and
stores etc. E cigarette reviews lay claim that these products are being
widely used by consumers at these places including bars but the
ordinance does not ban its use in bars. So, till then, the users would
be able to use one’s favorite and the best electronic cigarette brands
as per their choice.
Despite electronic cigarette reviews witnessing these devices as the best alternative to traditional smoking, Mayor Elizabeth Patterson and council members Alan Schwartzman and Tom Campbell however supported the ban. At the same time, Council members Mark Hughes and Christina Strawbridge opposed the amendment and cited examples of brands offering the best electronic cigarette products. Minors widely use these devices e cigarette reviews lay claim to this. But as they are outlined to pose a great threat to them, and therefore are already regulated but the council asked for more time to consider alternatives to the current policy.
It is a fact that electronic cigarettes are gaining ground across the globe but it is believed that these restrictions would definitely dishearten its lovers. Experts at DigitalSmoke.org believe that this approach is to safeguard the general public from whatever pitfalls that may come in the future. The main problem would now lie in vaping electronic cigarette brands at public places believes experts. But users can definitely take pleasure of experiencing the best electronic cigarette in the bars.
For added convenience, DigitalSmoke.org gives electronic cigarette reviews on almost all brands that would appeal them. The e cigarette reviews are expected to help users to get knowledge of the best e cigarette among all. With the assistance of the information offered by DigitalSmoke.org, one can buy electronic cigarette according to one’s own criteria.
About DigitalSmoke.org
Through authentic electronic cigarette reviews, the website Digitalsmoke.org offers customers to identify and select the best electronic cigarette brands. This review site is 100% independent that is not tended to any particular vapor cigarette brand. It does not have any links to any company nor does it receives any financial benefit for posting positive or negative reviews of any brand.
Despite electronic cigarette reviews witnessing these devices as the best alternative to traditional smoking, Mayor Elizabeth Patterson and council members Alan Schwartzman and Tom Campbell however supported the ban. At the same time, Council members Mark Hughes and Christina Strawbridge opposed the amendment and cited examples of brands offering the best electronic cigarette products. Minors widely use these devices e cigarette reviews lay claim to this. But as they are outlined to pose a great threat to them, and therefore are already regulated but the council asked for more time to consider alternatives to the current policy.
It is a fact that electronic cigarettes are gaining ground across the globe but it is believed that these restrictions would definitely dishearten its lovers. Experts at DigitalSmoke.org believe that this approach is to safeguard the general public from whatever pitfalls that may come in the future. The main problem would now lie in vaping electronic cigarette brands at public places believes experts. But users can definitely take pleasure of experiencing the best electronic cigarette in the bars.
For added convenience, DigitalSmoke.org gives electronic cigarette reviews on almost all brands that would appeal them. The e cigarette reviews are expected to help users to get knowledge of the best e cigarette among all. With the assistance of the information offered by DigitalSmoke.org, one can buy electronic cigarette according to one’s own criteria.
About DigitalSmoke.org
Through authentic electronic cigarette reviews, the website Digitalsmoke.org offers customers to identify and select the best electronic cigarette brands. This review site is 100% independent that is not tended to any particular vapor cigarette brand. It does not have any links to any company nor does it receives any financial benefit for posting positive or negative reviews of any brand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)