North Carolina, the nation's longtime leader in tobacco production, is
now considering a new tax on its tobacco-free relative — the electronic
cigarette — after a state committee approved draft legislation Tuesday.
The proposal will now head to the Republican-led North Carolina General Assembly
to consider during its upcoming session, which begins Wednesday. A
House-Senate study committee unanimously approved draft legislation for
the new excise tax and support was widespread across the aisle, even
coming from some unlikely groups.
The typically anti-tax Republicans are on board and Winston-Salem based tobacco giant Reynolds America essentially asked for it.
The
tax rate would be applied by volume, at 5 cents per milliliter of the
liquid used in e-cigarette cartridges; significantly less than current
tax rates on traditional tobacco products.
Reynolds
America, based in Winston-Salem, is the nation's second-largest
cigarette producer and has historically opposed higher state
cigarette taxes.
"I
promise you, you've never heard me or anyone in any other industry
stand up and ask for their products to be taxed, but yes, ma'am, we are
(asking to be taxed,)" said company Vice President David Powers.
A Reynolds
electronic cigarette carries a 0.5 milliliter cartridge and is
equivalent in puff counts to a pack of tobacco cigarettes. Other brands
can carry a cartridge of 1 milliliter or more. The new tax would add
about 2.5 cents to the cost of lighting up one e-cigarette compared to
the 45 cents currently added to a pack of regular cigarettes. All other
tobacco products, such as snuff or pipes, are taxed at 12.8 percent of
their price, according to documents produced by the state Revenue Laws Study Committee.
Powers
said because the federal government has already classified e-cigarettes
as a tobacco product, the company asked legislators to create the tax
to ensure it would be applied fairly, and reflective of the lower health
risk e-cigarettes pose.
"It's
eventually going to get taxed. We want it to be done the right way," he
said. By taxing the liquid volume of the e-cigarette, the proposal
covers all the e-cigarette products on the market in the same way at a
fair rate, he said.
Electronic
cigarettes neither have tobacco nor emit smoke, but create a vapor from
a nicotine liquid that is heated up with a battery.
Powers
said it is hard to predict how many cigarette users will eventually
move from traditional tobacco to e-cigarettes because the Reynolds
company currently only sells its brand of e-cigarettes in Colorado and
Utah. It plans to launch the product nationwide later this month.
Sen. Floyd McKissick, D-Durham, noted that the low rate could cause significant state revenue losses down the road.
"That
will have an impact upon us when we do our budget projections for lost
revenues ... moving from 45 cents to 5 cents," he said.
If
the tax passes, it is expected to generate about $5 million in revenue
by 2015, according to the state Revenue Laws Study Committee.
The
new tax proposal also includes a provision to ban e-cigarettes from
state jails and prisons and prohibits them from being distributed
to minors.
Only
one other state has passed an excise tax on e-cigarettes, though
several others are considering similar taxes. South Carolina is
proposing the same 5 cent volume rate. Minnesota adopted a plan to tax
e-cigarettes at 95 percent of their wholesale rate and Washington state
is considering a 75 percent tax, according to research conducted by
committee staff.
The
e-cigarette industry generated $1.8 billion in sales in 2013, according
to Nielsen data. The state estimates that 87-102 milliliters of
e-cigarette liquid is sold in North Carolina each year.
No comments:
Post a Comment